Massachusetts marijuanaMassachusetts recreational marijuana legalization offer profits to black market growers.

Massachusetts Marijuana Growers Profit from Question 4 Recreational Marijuana Legalization Delays

Massachusetts marijuana growers are amused by the incompetence and delays that the state’s governor and legislature have created regarding the state’s “Question 4” marijuana legalization law.

Question 4 was passed by voters in November, 2016, despite millions of dollars spent against it by GOP casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson and the Roman Catholic Church.

But after Question 4 passed, Republican Governor Charlie Baker signed a bill that delays by six months the opening of recreational marijuana stores.

Baker’s actions also delay other deadlines embedded in Question 4.

Republican governors and legislatures have a history of defying voters’ choices by delaying or even completely sabotaging implementation of voter-approved marijuana legalization.

The same thing is happening in Florida.

“The politicians are sticking a thumb in the eye of voters, but black market Massachusetts marijuana growers are happy,” said Mickey, a Boston marijuana grower who runs 4000 watts of lighting in a basement grow op.

“We wanted a law that allows us to grow plants and sell weed,” he said. “Now that they’ve delayed the recreational weed stores, us growers have six more months without recreational store competition.”

There was already an existing Massachusetts medical marijuana law, requiring patient registration, which many people consider to be poorly administered.

Question 4 legalized recreational marijuana cultivation and possession including:

  • Possession of up to an ounce in public by people 21 years and older.
  • Possession of up to 10 ounces of marijuana in the home by people 21 years and older.
  • A person 21 years of age or older giving up to an ounce of marijuana to another person 21 years of age or older for free and without public advertisement.
  • A person 21 years of age or older can grow up to 6 marijuana plants in their home dwelling, with a total of 12 marijuana plants per household no matter how many people live there.
  • Marijuana sellers must be licensed by the state.

The recreational Massachusetts marijuana law gives lots of power to local government, which can create laws…

  • Controlling the time, place, and manner of a marijuana establishment.
  • Limiting the number of marijuana establishments in a city or town.
  • Restricting licensed cultivation, processing, and manufacturing of marijuana that could be considered a “public nuisance.”

The law allows landlords to prohibit use, sale, and marijuana cultivation on their property, although it says landlords can’t prohibit people from consuming non-combusted cannabis.

It also allows employers to prohibit workplace marijuana consumption.

Question 4 says use of marijuana can’t be seen as an excuse to block someone from medical care.

The law created the Cannabis Control Commission and the Cannabis Advisory Board. The commission is given total regulatory authority over marijuana establishments.

The Cannabis Advisory Board is supposed to research marijuana regulation and give advice to the commission.

For Mickey, the biggest effect of the delays is that licensed recreational marijuana sales have been put off.

“They were supposed to start taking applications for legal growers pretty soon, but now that’s been delayed. None of us wanted to have to get licensed anyway,” he said.

Mickey says Massachusetts marijuana growing has special challenges because of cold weather, heavy snow, high humidity, expensive lodging, small apartments, and high energy costs.

“It’s worth it. I’m growing OG Kush, Timewreck, and Blue Dream and getting $450 an ounce. I hope they never follow through on creating the legalized recreational retail sales system!” he says.

, , , , , , , , , , ,

Reproduction whole or in part of any words, images, or any other material from any BigBudsMag.Com pages without first obtaining explicit written permission from BigBudsMag.com is strictly prohibited and is theft of intellectual property that could result in criminal or civil charges.